From f3b1656f34d9a3416a2323e9457ca7991e4e4b98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Wannenmacher Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:20:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] remove :has violation documentation It is no longer actually used anywhere. --- README.md | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 54f8b4a..bb47b0b 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -73,10 +73,6 @@ following: the long term. In ~4 months from this writing (2026-03-04) they become baseline widely available and I would want to rewrite all the styles then. I deem this to be a worthwhile trade-off. -3. The `:has()` CSS pseudo-class. While it's not as useful, it becomes baseline widely available at - the same time as nested CSS. Might as well use it then, as a non-supporting browser can't be - used either way. - Structure ---------